老司机午夜精品_国产精品高清免费在线_99热点高清无码中文字幕_在线观看国产成人AV天堂_中文字幕国产91

切換到寬版
  • 廣告投放
  • 稿件投遞
  • 繁體中文
    • 2903閱讀
    • 2回復(fù)

    [求助]telecentricity error [復(fù)制鏈接]

    上一主題 下一主題
    離線miraclelight
     
    發(fā)帖
    13
    光幣
    16
    光券
    0
    只看樓主 倒序閱讀 樓主  發(fā)表于: 2014-10-29
    大家好! 請(qǐng)問(wèn)Zemax能算 telecentricity error 嗎?能畫(huà)出telecentricity error vs. depth of focus 的圖嗎?
     
    分享到
    離線hopebox
    發(fā)帖
    484
    光幣
    332
    光券
    0
    只看該作者 1樓 發(fā)表于: 2014-10-29
    You may use the operand RAED to measure how telecentric the system is. If you know the depth of the focus for each field, you can make use of Universal Plot, bascially plotting RAED v.s the change of thickness (the range of the depth of focus). This can be only for one field at time. &<sN( ;%0R  
    F$Q@UVA  
    If I understand your question correctly then this should help. {r!X W  
    2x7%6'  
    離線miraclelight
    發(fā)帖
    13
    光幣
    16
    光券
    0
    只看該作者 2樓 發(fā)表于: 2014-11-12
    Thank you so much for your help!  I plotted RAED and RAID vs. the image plane position.  I noticed that for different wavelengths, the chief ray angles (RAED or RAID values) don't change much. I have a broadband objective, and I think the angles should be quite different.  How does Zemax calculate RAID or RAED? YbrsXp"  
    PiRbdl  
    Also, how should I obtain the centroid-based telecentricity error with Zemax?  Is there another Zemax operand for the centroid-based telecentricity error?