老司机午夜精品_国产精品高清免费在线_99热点高清无码中文字幕_在线观看国产成人AV天堂_中文字幕国产91

切換到寬版
  • 廣告投放
  • 稿件投遞
  • 繁體中文
    • 19125閱讀
    • 21回復(fù)

    [討論]LightToolsVsTracePro [復(fù)制鏈接]

    上一主題 下一主題
    離線shiloh
     
    發(fā)帖
    14
    光幣
    197
    光券
    0
    只看樓主 倒序閱讀 樓主  發(fā)表于: 2005-09-22
      TracePro Overview q'~ ?azg:  
    rt)70=  
    Like LightTools, TracePro is an solid-modeling based illumination modeling program with a Windows-based interface and CAD import/export capability HTiqErD2_  
    Q/&H3N  
    TracePro modeling capabilities are similar to LightTools but with significant weaknesses that make it harder to use and less flexible, and is especially limited in 3D texture modeling compared to LightTools Y^$^B,  
    ZLw7-H6Fh  
    TracePro analysis features are similar to LightTools, but LightTools is much stronger as an interactive design AND analysis tool
     
    分享到
    離線shiloh
    發(fā)帖
    14
    光幣
    197
    光券
    0
    只看該作者 1樓 發(fā)表于: 2005-09-22
    TracePro Weaknesses C%#=@HC  
    `_Iy8rv:P  
    User Interface 9[K".VeT]  
    Must move/rotate objects by dialog box only Y-\/Y*;cd  
    Default naming convention (for spheres/elements, etc) is confusing and ambiguous ;/?M&rX  
    O|j(CaF  
    Modeling ))f%3_H  
    Most elements cannot be edited 1M+o7HO.mG  
      Must be deleted and recreated (including optical properties) %&m/e?@%I  
    No unboolean capability C5oslP/@  
    Boolean limited to two objects at a time nI4Kuz`dF  
    3D texture very limited vs. LT
    離線shiloh
    發(fā)帖
    14
    光幣
    197
    光券
    0
    只看該作者 2樓 發(fā)表于: 2005-09-22
    TracePro Weaknesses ~ED8]*H|`  
    OI0#@_L&  
    Ray Trace Ay\=&4dv  
    No interactive (point & shoot) ray trace PqV9k,5f  
    No point sources; no volume sources ( HCB\!g  
    Clipped Lambertian sources are difficult (LED or fiber output) eF+:w:\h  
    LV|ZZ.d h  
    Analysis LVNq@,s  
    No illumination error estimate hu}`,2  
    Only 4 preset bins “available” c\"t+/Z  
    No 2D intensity distributions of full spheres / blVm1F  
    Limited ray sorting options
    離線shiloh
    發(fā)帖
    14
    光幣
    197
    光券
    0
    只看該作者 3樓 發(fā)表于: 2005-09-22
    LT Strengths vs. TracePro $|+q9 o\  
    `K -j  
    LT has excellent design features vs. TracePro *J^l r"%c  
    Interactive ray trace `4^-@}  
    Editable geometry x'IVP[xh`A  
    More powerful macro language in LT (VB/COM/Excel/etc. vs. Scheme) XaT9`L<  
    X(s HFVU+  
    TracePro features not fully or well implemented wdS4iQD  
    3D textures /5cFa  
    Source definition _,*ld#'s  
    Many others
    離線shiloh
    發(fā)帖
    14
    光幣
    197
    光券
    0
    只看該作者 4樓 發(fā)表于: 2005-09-22
    TracePro/LT Feature Checklist }:JE*D|  
    OZ{YQ}t{^1  
    Recent LT features addressing TracePro competition ['9awgkr/  
    New LT 4.0 User Interface <dzfD;  
    Accelerated Ray Tracing (improved in 5.0) B~S"1EE[  
    AOI and Wavelength Scattering capabilities +?"N5%a%F  
    Powerful 3D texture modeling for backlights (greatly expanded in v5.1 available 12/04) hf5yTs  
    `qP <S  
    TracePro features not in LT L~x PIu  
    Ray trace through GRIN material $P<T`3Jg  
    Birefringent ray tracing
    離線shiloh
    發(fā)帖
    14
    光幣
    197
    光券
    0
    只看該作者 5樓 發(fā)表于: 2005-09-22
    Misc. Comparisons, LT vs. TP "ecG\}R=  
    : ?K}.Kb  
    Some large CAD models consume 20-30% more RAM and more CPU time in TP vs. LT D@jG+k-Lm  
    DeqTr:  
    TP CAD import repair feature much slower than LT }^T7S2_Qy  
    w8MQA!=l  
    Inability to edit properties of Booleaned objects in TP (easy and unlimited in LT) 2|="!c8K  
    ?&qa3y)wX:  
    Luminance meter simulation is simple approximation in TP, much more flexible and accurate in LT LW+a-i  
    syuW>Z8s  
    Most operations in LT can be done by mouse, by numeric input, or any combination (fewer TP features are mouse-enabled) Xz/5 Wis4  
    Xr?(w(3  
    LT online help is extensive and useful, but very limited in TP =m<; Jx5  
    $e(]L(o;  
    ORA Tech Support for LT is by a dedicated team or experience illumination and optical engineers
    離線shiloh
    發(fā)帖
    14
    光幣
    197
    光券
    0
    只看該作者 6樓 發(fā)表于: 2005-09-22
    3D Texture Comparisons +ZuT\P&kR5  
    'brt?oZ%  
    3D texture modeling more flexible and much faster to ray trace in LT vs. TP 608}-J=3#  
    $-HP5Kj(k-  
    LT (5.1) has flexible features to parametrically vary all 3D texture features (spacing, size, angles, depth, etc.) by equation or by direct “placement lists” imported from spreadsheet or other software J<p.J3I  
    JnC$}amr  
    When optimization is available in 2005, these parametric textures will make it much easier to design backlight systems
    離線shiloh
    發(fā)帖
    14
    光幣
    197
    光券
    0
    只看該作者 7樓 發(fā)表于: 2005-09-22
    Coming Soon in LightTools  O=,[u?  
    hW^*b:v{  
    QNH-b9u>8  
    Photorealistic rendering will be introduced in LightTools in 2005 79DzrLu  
        Available now in TP, but feature is poorly implemented DC&3=Nd  
    (8Q0?SZN  
    Illumination optimization including special backlight design features will be introduced in 2005 4rcNBmA,  
        Has been demonstrated in papers, ORA demos, and limited customer testing in 2004 ~0;l\^  
        W^a-K  
        Is now being developed for maximum ease of use for typical users and applications       without user programming
    發(fā)帖
    158
    光幣
    275
    光券
    0
    只看該作者 8樓 發(fā)表于: 2005-09-29
    看來樓主對這兩個軟件深有了解嗎!佩服佩服...
    離線robin
    發(fā)帖
    13
    光幣
    60
    光券
    0
    只看該作者 9樓 發(fā)表于: 2005-10-12
    Shiloh,你好!你的帖子非常好!謝謝!