Under POP propagation you will see Beam Definition, under this tab you can define either the "Total Power" of the beam or the "Peak Irradiance". So the total power returns under the window (as you captured) will be reporting the total power with respect to the energy defined under this "Beam Definition". j:# wt70
諸葛隨風(fēng)
2016-07-21 09:49
hopebox:Under POP propagation you will see Beam Definition, under this tab you can define either the "Total Power" of the beam or the "Peak Irradiance". So the total power returns under the window (as you captured) will be reporting the total power .. (2016-07-20 16:07) DX>Yf}
d:C|laZHn 選擇total power 和 peak irradiance會有什么不同呢，還有我想改變鏡子大小來看光的通過率，設(shè)定選擇surface type里的 aperture type 里的通光孔徑的大小，再看total power 的大小，這樣是不是可以說明不同半徑下光的通過率啊。
hopebox
2016-07-21 15:47
諸葛隨風(fēng):選擇total power 和 peak irradiance會有什么不同呢，還有我想改變鏡子大小來看光的通過率，設(shè)定選擇surface type里的 aperture type 里的通光孔徑的大小，再看total power 的大小，這樣是不是可以說明不同半徑下光的通過率啊。 (2016-07-21 09:49) LtrE;+%2oz
)gNS%t c*K Whether choosing Total power or peak irradance, the energy/power of beam as a function of radius will just be calculated relatively to how you define it. So it shouldn't matter, and just depends on how the source beam is defined though (since the beam profile is there). -hy`N p 0eJqDCmH I think the method you proposed shall return the physical quantity you want to study. Hope this helps.
諸葛隨風(fēng)
2016-07-22 13:26
hopebox:Whether choosing Total power or peak irradance, the energy/power of beam as a function of radius will just be calculated relatively to how you define it. So it shouldn't matter, and just depends on how the source beam is defined though (since the beam pro .. (2016-07-21 15:47) P#j >hS
