老司机午夜精品_国产精品高清免费在线_99热点高清无码中文字幕_在线观看国产成人AV天堂_中文字幕国产91

切換到寬版
  • 廣告投放
  • 稿件投遞
  • 繁體中文
    • 9424閱讀
    • 12回復(fù)

    [分享]干涉儀和平板玻璃的測(cè)試方法 [復(fù)制鏈接]

    上一主題 下一主題
    離線yazhuge
     
    發(fā)帖
    1442
    光幣
    581767635
    光券
    0
    只看樓主 倒序閱讀 樓主  發(fā)表于: 2008-07-12
    There is an incredible amount of interest in testing mirrors using Interferometers and we are always being asked if testing with Interferometers is better than a conventional Null test? cnC_#kp  
    The answer is a resounding "No" }P16Xb)p  
    Interferometers cannot compete with the "Time Honoured" method of a knife edge and the human eye in a Double Pass Null test for accuracy. If they could, we would be using an Interferometer instead of conventional methods. @#1cx  
    But it is amazing the faith placed in an Interferometer result! We are occasionally getting challenged about the specification of our mirrors on the basis of a poor Interferometer test. There seems to be a semi religious belief that the Interferometer result is correct and our method is wrong, - when in reality it is the opposite way round! O<Jwaap  
    Even firms in the optics industry who should know better are being taken in by Interferometer results. We are making some information available on the level of accuracy that can be expected from our tests compared with Interferometer tests. i:R!T,  
    "Conventional Methods" - The Double Pass Null Test ltP